May 24, 2012


Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)

Rate this item
(18 votes)

Electromagnetic field surrounding a powerlineElectromagnetic field or electric and magnetic fields (EMF) are invisible waves of energy that surrounds electrical devices. Televisions, monitors, refrigerators, and practically any electronic device on this planet including cellular phones, all emit EMF. In fact, almost all of humanity is practically immersed in an invisible sea of electromagnetic field. Although it has been shown that the magnetic fields that penetrate the body do modify the biological functioning of living organisms, it is still up for debate as to the detrimental outcome of the modification.

 

Why Worry?

 

In 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drafted a report entitled “Evaluation of the Potential Carcinogenicity of Electromagnetic Fields”. The report showed some evidence suggesting a cause and effect relationship between magnetic fields and cancer incidence in humans, especially in children. The study reported that magnetic fields could interact with human cells and tissue inducing a carcinogenic response. Upon completing the draft, the EPA made the recommendation to classify EMFs as a Class B carcinogen. Class B means that there is a probability for EMF to cause cancer in humans. It would be included with chemicals like DDT, formaldehyde, and dioxins. However, after the report was publicly released and now affecting utility, military, and large computer industries, the EPA changed its tune and its recommendation no longer classifying EMF as a class B carcinogen. Instead, they claimed that the link between EMFs and cancer is not appropriate despite the fact that the study detailed a consistent pattern of childhood leukemia, cancer of the nervous system, and lymphoma with EMF exposure.

 

EMF Safety

 

There are various recommended ratings for EMF tolerability. For instance, with computers, the Swedish safety standard specified a maximum of 0.25 mG at a distance of 50cm. However, a lot of U.S. manufacturers have 5-100 mG at the same distance. In fact, protective screens that are placed over monitors do not block the EMF. Various states have certain legislations regarding the required tolerable amount of EMF.

 

Be Aware

 

The EPA offers a couple of suggestions for those who are wary of EMF exposure. Create distance between you and the EMF source. Minimize the time you spend exposed to the source.

 

Opt for hands-free devices when talking on a wireless or cellular phone. The electromagnetic radiation that they give off takes the form of radio-frequency (RF) energy. Although studies are still inconclusive as to the negative health effects caused by the radiation from cell phones, keeping the phone away from your brain is an easy safeguard to implement.

 

There are commercially available EMF meters that you can also use to determine the amount of EMF radiation a particular device emits. You can even measure electric wirings using an EMF meter.

 

As the general public becomes more aware and more concerned about electromagnetic field (EMF), the controversy and debate regarding its safety continue.

 

Since we have yet to know if EMF exposure may cause or encourage cancer, if there are safe exposure levels, and if there are any safeguards that we can take to protect ourselves, it’s best to take some precautions. This controversy is likely to follow a similar path as smoking cigarettes, with one study confirming the risks and another disproving the dangers until eventually the truth surfaces. Think of the big organizations, that are influencing and encouraging inconclusive correlations between EMF and health hazards, and ask yourself if it’s worth the risk.

 

 

 

(2010) Electromagnetic Fields. Retrieved August 23, 2010.

(2010) Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) and Health Hazards. Retrieved August 23, 2010.

(2010) Electro Magnetic Field (EMF) - Hazardous to Our Health? Retrieved August 23, 2010.

(1990) Evaluation of the Potential Carcinogenicity of Electromagnetic Fields. Retrieved August 23, 2010.

1 Comment

  • Comment Link Babs Schlater Monday, 28 March 2011 09:20 posted by Babs Schlater

    Although the information is helpful, it's awfully frustrating. To think that there's a chance that the U.S. EPA is not after the public's protection is disturbing. But, I guess it's no different than anything else. Who out there is not affected by big business. And it doesn't get much bigger than military.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the required information (*) where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed. After you submit your comment, you will see a confirmation message in red that states "awaiting moderation" just below the Captcha.

Join Our Newsletter

Latest Comments

  • Hi Howard, Sorry to hear you having such a hard time. One of my favorite resources for rebate information is a government resource found at…
    New Energy-efficient Rebates in California
  • I replaced 14 windows and 1 patio door in my home this year but can't find rebates for them. I live in Contra Costa County,…
    New Energy-efficient Rebates in California
  • While this is promising business news, we're missing a major point here: Walmart, no matter how "sustainable" it is, is inherently unsustainable, no matter how…
    A Case for Sustainability
  • It is amazing to me that textiles take up such a large portion of landfills. It is so easy to make sure clothes get reused…
    Fashion for the Environment – Runway to Green
  • We have loads of cardboard from our import business. If you soak the cardboard in water and shred it down a bit, it actually becomes…
    How to Compost

Site Statistics

We have 521 guests online