May 24, 2012


Nuclear Radiation Exposure, Effects, and Protection

Rate this item
(14 votes)

Nuclear danger symbolWe are constantly exposed to some level of radiation on a normal basis. It is a natural part of our planet. That natural radiation becomes ionized by the ground, outer space, and even human bodies. Therefore, we breathe it in the air, eat it in our foods and drink it in our water. Even our homes contain these low levels of radiation due to the building materials.


Certain foods, building materials and locations have higher levels of natural radiation. Items, like tobacco, fertilizer or welding rods, can also add to our exposure. In most cases, this exposure is nothing of concern. Exceptions include natural gas exposure like radon that may contaminate the air we breathe.


In the U.S., the average annual exposure to radiation measures 6.2 millisieverts (mSv). About half of the exposure stems from natural radiation with the other half due to medical procedures. A cancer screening CT scan, for example, produces about 10 mSv. Both natural and man-made sources affect us in the same way with no detectable health risks at these low levels.


The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) acknowledges a dose-response relationship between radiation and cancer stating that any amount of exposure can create a risk for cancer with the risk increasing as exposure increases. The NRC has set regulations on the amount radiation exposure within the Code of Federal Regulations. They have even set a limit for those who work with radioactive material at 50 mSv. To put the Fukushima accident in perspective, it is likely that the Japanese volunteers in the Fukushima nuclear plant incident have been exposed to 250 – 500 mSv.


Effects of Radiation Exposure


Different people are more or less affected by radiation depending on their level of health before exposure. Therefore, there is no one safe level of radiation.


Low levels of radiation exposure may be so small that they are undetectable. The repair mechanisms of our bodies help to protect against small amounts of radiation. Unlike acute radiation that tends to kill cells, low doses are more likely to damage or even alter cell DNA. Genetic effects resulting from mutated reproductive cells, like congenital abnormalities or still births, are 5 times less likely to occur than cancer. Leukemia and cancer have been known to be the adverse health effects of radiation exposure. About 1 out of 100 people die of cancer due to normal levels of radiation. However, if there is a long latent period, radiation causing cancer that’s not detected until years later may not be linked to the exposure but to some other carcinogen. Currently, there is no data to directly connect cancer to radiation exposure of less than 100 mSv.


High levels of ionizing radiation begin at around 500 mSv. Symptoms may appear within days or even hours of exposure, including nausea, diarrhea or vomiting. Greater exposure will bring on symptoms faster and have a higher probability of death. Acute Radiation Syndrome is detected by a rapid bodily response to the high dose. Scientists believe that if a population were exposed to 3,500 – 5,000 mSv, half would die within the timeframe of a few minutes to 30 days. In the instance of Chernobyl, for example, workers were exposed to doses of 800 – 16,000 mSv. Many died within months of the exposure.


Protection from Radioactive Exposure


There is a false belief that salt products, or increased sodium, will help to protect against nuclear radiation. However, one would need to consume an excessive amount of salt to get enough iodide to have any benefit. Instead of salt infused products, potassium iodide is also available in tablet form. The non-radioactive iodine is intended to saturate the thyroid gland so that any later exposure to radioactive iodine would only be excreted and not absorbed by the thyroid. If the thyroid glad is exposed to radiation, this could lead to thyroid cancer as discovered from Chernobyl. Exposure will come less from the air and more from sources like food and milk. People are cautioned, however, against taking iodide tablets as a mere preventative measure with no real danger identified. The iodide can cause significant side affects to certain individuals including those allergic to iodide, with shellfish allergies, or having compromised thyroids.


Environmental Radiation Tracking


To ease people’s fears, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors radiation releases throughout the United States using a system called RadNet. This network of stations tracks and documents the trends in environmental radiation. Air, drinking water, milk and precipitation are all collected samples to assess radioactive levels. Data is collected and published to assess public exposure and environmental impacts.


U.S. NRC website: “Fact Sheet on Biological Effects of Radiation”

EPA website: “RadNet - Tracking Environmental Radiation Nationwide”


3 comments

  • Comment Link Kay Martin Thursday, 24 March 2011 09:32 posted by Kay Martin

    Great information! It's so much better to be prepared than paranoid. With incidents of cancer not getting smaller any time soon, it helps to have a perspective on radiation and the "acceptable" levels. If you ask me, though, it all adds up. And who knows what you're dispositioned to tolerate.

  • Comment Link Trav Friday, 01 April 2011 19:14 posted by Trav

    Thanks, this is very informative and helpful. I would like to know more about whether it is safe to keep a watch as a gift sent from an area around 60-80km from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant very recently. I understand that external radiation contamination can often be washed off the body, is that correct?

  • Comment Link Ed Thomas Friday, 08 April 2011 15:34 posted by Ed Thomas

    Trav,

    Thank you for your feedback. We hope the information below will be of help in your situation:

    Specific radioactive decontamination procedures generally depend on the degree of contamination. Without getting too heavy in the details, there are 2 things we can address.

    1) Date the watch left the area & location from which it came. Radiation from the first hydrogen explosion on March 12th was detected 25 km northwest from the plant. Radiation from the second explosion on March 14th was detected 40 km southwest from the plant. Radiation readings from the March 15th explosion were reported up to 60 km northwest of the plant. On March 31st, the IAEA recommended that Japan expand the nuclear radiation danger zone from a 20 km radius to a 40 km radius. Sounds like your situation may be close to no or only a slight exposure.

    2) The way in which radioactive contaminants may have adhered to the watch surface. The type of contamination determines the decontamination procedure. Contaminants may be held by electrostatic forces/surface tension, absorbed into porous materials, mechanically bonded to surfaces via oil or grease, or chemically bonded to the surface. From what it sounds like, if the watch were contaminated, chances are the degree of contamination was low and only on the outer surface meaning that no radioactivity entered the object. If that’s the case, then it could be cleaned similarly to external contamination that can be washed off the body.

    High levels of exposure require special soap, solvents or tools. For low levels, according to the Health Ministry washing the surface of items like spinach with water is proven to effectively remove radioactive materials. But, what if your watch isn’t waterproof. It is a common practice for nuclear power plants to use disposable towels for cleaning. Consider using disposable gloves and perhaps goggles. And remember to put any possibly contaminated supplies in a plastic bag for disposal. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission can help you find low-level waste disposal facilities and a more definitive answer to your particular situation. Hope this helps! http://www.nrc.gov/waste/llw-disposal/licensing/locations.html

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the required information (*) where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed. After you submit your comment, you will see a confirmation message in red that states "awaiting moderation" just below the Captcha.

Join Our Newsletter

Latest Comments

  • Hi Howard, Sorry to hear you having such a hard time. One of my favorite resources for rebate information is a government resource found at…
    New Energy-efficient Rebates in California
  • I replaced 14 windows and 1 patio door in my home this year but can't find rebates for them. I live in Contra Costa County,…
    New Energy-efficient Rebates in California
  • While this is promising business news, we're missing a major point here: Walmart, no matter how "sustainable" it is, is inherently unsustainable, no matter how…
    A Case for Sustainability
  • It is amazing to me that textiles take up such a large portion of landfills. It is so easy to make sure clothes get reused…
    Fashion for the Environment – Runway to Green
  • We have loads of cardboard from our import business. If you soak the cardboard in water and shred it down a bit, it actually becomes…
    How to Compost

Site Statistics

We have 460 guests online